
FINRA Rule 3280: Selling Away and Private Placements
Learn how FINRA Rule 3280 applies to private securities transactions, including when prior written notice is enough and when selling compensation triggers required firm approval, supervision, and books-and-records treatment. The episode also contrasts compensated deals with uncompensated referrals so you can spot the exam traps fast.
Show Notes
- 3280. Private Securities Transactions of an Associated ...: https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/3280
Chapter 1
The Finders Fee Trap
Marcus Reed
Elena Vance is a registered representative at Apex Securities, and she finds herself in a situation that traps a lot of series exam candidates. A promising tech startup approaches her with an offer. They tell her, look, if you introduce some of your accredited investors to our private placement, we will give you a two percent equity finder fee. Now, this private placement is completely outside Apex Securities approved product line. Apex does not carry it, does not offer it, and has no official connection to it.
Marcus Reed
So, here is our scenario question for today. Before facilitating any of these private placement transactions, what explicit step must Elena take under FINRA rules? Let us look at your choices.
Marcus Reed
Option A requires written notice to Apex Securities and prior written approval from the firm before participating. Option B allows participation after providing written notice, without waiting for firm approval. Option C mandates a Form U4 update within thirty days under Outside Business Activity rules. And Option D permits verbal compliance notice as long as the transactions remain off the firm books and records.
Marcus Reed
I am going to pause for a few seconds. Take a moment, evaluate the distractors, and pick the single strongest answer in your mind.
Marcus Reed
If you locked in Option A, you got it right! Under FINRA Rule 3280, Elena must provide prior written notice to Apex Securities and receive explicit written approval before she touches those private transactions.
Chapter 2
Why Selling Away Triggers Firm Supervision
Marcus Reed
Let us break down why this rule exists and why the test makers love this scenario so much. FINRA Rule 3280 covers what the industry calls private securities transactions, or more commonly, selling away. Selling away basically means executing trades or raising capital outside the scope of your employing broker dealer.
Marcus Reed
And the rule is extremely specific when it comes to selling compensation. The exact regulatory threshold applies in the case of a transaction in which an associated person has received or may receive selling compensation. That is not just cash commission. FINRA defines selling compensation broadly to include stock options, equity finder fees, future profits, referral fees, and even simple expense reimbursements. If you are getting any financial benefit from the deal, the full weight of Rule 3280 kicks in.
Marcus Reed
Now, let us examine why those other options fail on test day, because understanding the distractors is how you build real test taking confidence. Option B claims that written notice alone is enough and that she does not need to wait for approval. That is false when compensation is involved. Notice without written permission is a violation. You cannot just drop a memo on your manager desk on Friday evening and start selling on Saturday morning.
Marcus Reed
Option C tries to trick you by misclassifying this as a standard Outside Business Activity under FINRA Rule 3270, claiming she just needs to update her Form U4 within thirty days. That is a very tempting distractor! But here is the critical distinction: outside business activities, like teaching an evening class or selling real estate, require prior written notice under Rule 3270, but securities transactions fall under Rule 3280. You cannot hide a private securities offer under general outside business rules.
Marcus Reed
And Option D, Option D suggests verbal notice is fine as long as the trade stays off the firm books. That is completely backwards. In fact, if the firm approves a compensated private transaction, Rule 3280 explicitly commands that the firm must record the transaction on its own books and records and supervise Elena participation as if the trade were executed directly through Apex Securities itself.
Marcus Reed
In my experience working with candidates, people fall into this trap because they view these deals as off duty personal favors. They think, well, I met this founder at a weekend barbecue, I am using my personal email, Apex does not even offer this private fund, so it has nothing to do with my employer. But regulators do not see it that way. The public sees Elena as a securities professional, and if that private deal goes bust, investors will come knocking on Apex Securities door.
Marcus Reed
So, here is your easy memory aid for test day: If You Get Paid, Written Approval Must Be Made. Say that to yourself whenever you see selling compensation on a scenario question.
Marcus Reed
Now, let us test your understanding with a crucial fact variation. What if Elena was doing this completely for free? Suppose the founder is her sibling, and Elena agrees to introduce investors with zero selling compensation, no equity, no commissions, no indirect fees whatsoever. What changes?
Marcus Reed
Under Rule 3280, for non compensated private securities transactions, Elena must still provide prior written notice to Apex Securities detailing the transaction and her proposed role. However, because there is no selling compensation, the firm is not required to approve or supervise the trades on its books. Apex simply provides a written acknowledgment of her notice. Notice is always required, but compensation is what triggers mandatory written approval, firm supervision, and books and records entry.
Marcus Reed
Keep that distinction sharp, remember the memory aid, and you will crush these Rule 3280 questions on your exam. Talk to you next time.